Door safety resource
Finger Saver vs Fingershield
Compare Finger Saver and Fingershield by intended use, warranty, durability, colour choice and budget.
| Consideration | Finger Saver | Fingershield |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Practical budget option for suitable medium and lower-risk doors. | Premium protection for demanding, high-use and higher-priority environments. |
| Warranty | 12 months. | 5 years. |
| Colour choice | White. | Multiple colour options. |
| Best fit | Projects where a straightforward specification and lower initial cost are priorities. | Sites prioritising durability, evidence, appearance choice and longer-term value. |
| Selection principle | Choose according to the assessed risk and use of each door, not simply one product for the whole building. | |
Balanced specification: some organisations may use Fingershield on the busiest or highest-priority doors and Finger Saver on suitable lower-demand doors.
Choose Finger Saver when…
- The door is assessed as a suitable medium or lower-risk application.
- White suits the environment.
- A 12-month warranty aligns with the buying requirement.
- Lower initial cost is a significant project consideration.
Choose Fingershield when…
- The door is busy, demanding or a higher-priority risk.
- A longer warranty is preferred.
- Colour choice or a premium finish matters.
- The organisation wants the established premium specification.
Related resources
Need help choosing suitable door protection?
Compare the two products online or contact the Fingershield team for practical guidance based on the door, environment and level of use.
